Member-only story
Is Law a Science?
A Critical Analysis of Legal Studies
The question of whether legal studies can be considered a science has occupied both legal scholars and philosophers of science for centuries. This fundamental inquiry into the nature of legal studies reflects a crucial aspect of academic self-reflection. As noted by H.L.A. Hart, one of the most influential legal philosophers of the 20th century:
“Few questions concerning human society have been asked with such persistence and answered by serious thinkers in so many diverse, strange, and even paradoxical ways as the question ‘What is law?’”
This observation extends naturally to the question of whether the study of law constitutes a science, and the very fact that legal scholars engage in such self-reflective inquiry already demonstrates an important scientific quality: the critical examination of one’s own foundations and methods.
To approach the question of law’s scientific character systematically, we must first establish what constitutes “science” in the academic sense. Traditional criteria for scientific disciplines include:
- Systematic methodology
- Intersubjective verifiability
